Scott J Fields

Trademark attorney of record on 640 registered marks in USPTO records.

Top Trademark Attorney
640registrations of record
7list appearances
#4best rank achieved
46states represented

Recognition

Top Trademark Attorney #4 — Nationwide 2007 · 347 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #4 — California 2007 · 72 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #8 — Florida 2007 · 39 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #8 — New Jersey 2007 · 21 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #10 — Texas 2007 · 25 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #6 — Nationwide 2006 · 211 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #8 — California 2006 · 45 registrations

Registrations by year

20201
20131
20101
20091
200824
2007347
2006211
200528
20043
20034
20025
20018
20006

Where their clients are incorporated

California125 registrations
Florida67 registrations
Texas47 registrations
New York41 registrations
New Jersey40 registrations
Pennsylvania34 registrations
Delaware25 registrations
Georgia24 registrations

Based on the owner address of record. Companies frequently incorporate in one state while operating in another, so this reflects client domicile rather than where the attorney practises.

Display this on your site

If this is your profile, you are welcome to display the badge. It links back to this page.

Option 1 — script embed

Renders the badge and keeps it current if your ranking changes.

Option 2 — plain HTML

For sites that block third-party scripts.

You are responsible for compliance with your state bar's advertising rules, which in some states govern how awards and rankings may be displayed. Our methodology is published at /guides/attorneys/methodology/ so you can point to it if your bar requires the basis of an award to be disclosed.

How this list is compiled

TrademarkToolbox Top Trademark Attorney lists are not a ranking of attorney quality. Rank is based solely on the number of trademark registrations that list the attorney as attorney of record, for applications tied to the jurisdictions listed above. It measures filing volume, nothing else.

Volume reflects firm size, practice model and client mix. A solo practitioner handling a small number of complex matters will rank below a high-volume filing practice, and that says nothing about the quality of either. These lists are not an endorsement, a recommendation, or a substitute for your own due diligence when choosing counsel.

Data comes from USPTO public records as indexed by TrademarkToolbox. Attorney names are matched conservatively: we do not merge similar names, so an attorney who appears in the record under more than one form may be undercounted. Counts include registered marks only, by registration year. Full methodology · Request a correction or removal