David J Cho

Trademark attorney of record on 579 registered marks in USPTO records.

Top Trademark Attorney
579registrations of record
8list appearances
#3best rank achieved
13states represented

Recognition

Top Trademark Attorney #6 — Nevada 2020 · 28 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #7 — Nevada 2019 · 28 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #8 — Nevada 2010 · 25 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #9 — Nevada 2007 · 21 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #5 — Nevada 2006 · 32 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #5 — Nevada 2004 · 19 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #3 — Nevada 2002 · 30 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #10 — Nevada 2001 · 12 registrations

Registrations by year

202613
202520
202418
202318
20224
202110
202029
201928
201821
201717
201616
201520
201429
201320
201212
201118
201026
200920
200822
200728

Where their clients are incorporated

Nevada489 registrations
Delaware60 registrations
New York10 registrations
Texas4 registrations
Missouri3 registrations
California2 registrations
Maryland2 registrations
DC1 registrations

Based on the owner address of record. Companies frequently incorporate in one state while operating in another, so this reflects client domicile rather than where the attorney practises.

Display this on your site

If this is your profile, you are welcome to display the badge. It links back to this page.

Option 1 — script embed

Renders the badge and keeps it current if your ranking changes.

Option 2 — plain HTML

For sites that block third-party scripts.

You are responsible for compliance with your state bar's advertising rules, which in some states govern how awards and rankings may be displayed. Our methodology is published at /guides/attorneys/methodology/ so you can point to it if your bar requires the basis of an award to be disclosed.

How this list is compiled

TrademarkToolbox Top Trademark Attorney lists are not a ranking of attorney quality. Rank is based solely on the number of trademark registrations that list the attorney as attorney of record, for applications tied to the jurisdictions listed above. It measures filing volume, nothing else.

Volume reflects firm size, practice model and client mix. A solo practitioner handling a small number of complex matters will rank below a high-volume filing practice, and that says nothing about the quality of either. These lists are not an endorsement, a recommendation, or a substitute for your own due diligence when choosing counsel.

Data comes from USPTO public records as indexed by TrademarkToolbox. Attorney names are matched conservatively: we do not merge similar names, so an attorney who appears in the record under more than one form may be undercounted. Counts include registered marks only, by registration year. Full methodology · Request a correction or removal