Charles G Zug

Trademark attorney of record on 1,633 registered marks in USPTO records.

Top Trademark Attorney
1,633registrations of record
6list appearances
#4best rank achieved
31states represented

Recognition

Top Trademark Attorney #9 — South Carolina 2020 · 15 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #8 — South Carolina 2018 · 13 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #10 — Louisiana 2014 · 12 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #4 — South Carolina 2012 · 17 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #6 — South Carolina 2011 · 12 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #7 — South Carolina 2009 · 13 registrations

Registrations by year

202677
202590
202493
202384
202279
202157
202081
201977
201886
201774
201675
201573
201471
201381
201289
201171
201050
200979
200852
200732

Where their clients are incorporated

Delaware476 registrations
South Carolina189 registrations
Georgia159 registrations
Nevada39 registrations
Massachusetts35 registrations
Louisiana34 registrations
New York32 registrations
Ohio30 registrations

Based on the owner address of record. Companies frequently incorporate in one state while operating in another, so this reflects client domicile rather than where the attorney practises.

Display this on your site

If this is your profile, you are welcome to display the badge. It links back to this page.

Option 1 — script embed

Renders the badge and keeps it current if your ranking changes.

Option 2 — plain HTML

For sites that block third-party scripts.

You are responsible for compliance with your state bar's advertising rules, which in some states govern how awards and rankings may be displayed. Our methodology is published at /guides/attorneys/methodology/ so you can point to it if your bar requires the basis of an award to be disclosed.

How this list is compiled

TrademarkToolbox Top Trademark Attorney lists are not a ranking of attorney quality. Rank is based solely on the number of trademark registrations that list the attorney as attorney of record, for applications tied to the jurisdictions listed above. It measures filing volume, nothing else.

Volume reflects firm size, practice model and client mix. A solo practitioner handling a small number of complex matters will rank below a high-volume filing practice, and that says nothing about the quality of either. These lists are not an endorsement, a recommendation, or a substitute for your own due diligence when choosing counsel.

Data comes from USPTO public records as indexed by TrademarkToolbox. Attorney names are matched conservatively: we do not merge similar names, so an attorney who appears in the record under more than one form may be undercounted. Counts include registered marks only, by registration year. Full methodology · Request a correction or removal