Catherine M C Farrelly

Trademark attorney of record on 1,888 registered marks in USPTO records.

Top Trademark Attorney
1,888registrations of record
7list appearances
#2best rank achieved
34states represented

Recognition

Top Trademark Attorney #7 — New York All years · 642 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #6 — New York 2017 · 43 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #5 — New York 2014 · 39 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #2 — Vermont 2012 · 11 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #6 — New York 2012 · 36 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #5 — New York 2011 · 41 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #10 — New York 2009 · 31 registrations

Registrations by year

202676
202596
2024105
202391
202287
202192
2020105
2019133
201896
2017126
2016103
201594
201486
201366
201292
201179
201069
200969
200854
200741

Where their clients are incorporated

New York642 registrations
Delaware596 registrations
California77 registrations
Florida39 registrations
New Jersey35 registrations
Arizona21 registrations
Massachusetts20 registrations
Vermont17 registrations

Based on the owner address of record. Companies frequently incorporate in one state while operating in another, so this reflects client domicile rather than where the attorney practises.

Display this on your site

If this is your profile, you are welcome to display the badge. It links back to this page.

Option 1 — script embed

Renders the badge and keeps it current if your ranking changes.

Option 2 — plain HTML

For sites that block third-party scripts.

You are responsible for compliance with your state bar's advertising rules, which in some states govern how awards and rankings may be displayed. Our methodology is published at /guides/attorneys/methodology/ so you can point to it if your bar requires the basis of an award to be disclosed.

How this list is compiled

TrademarkToolbox Top Trademark Attorney lists are not a ranking of attorney quality. Rank is based solely on the number of trademark registrations that list the attorney as attorney of record, for applications tied to the jurisdictions listed above. It measures filing volume, nothing else.

Volume reflects firm size, practice model and client mix. A solo practitioner handling a small number of complex matters will rank below a high-volume filing practice, and that says nothing about the quality of either. These lists are not an endorsement, a recommendation, or a substitute for your own due diligence when choosing counsel.

Data comes from USPTO public records as indexed by TrademarkToolbox. Attorney names are matched conservatively: we do not merge similar names, so an attorney who appears in the record under more than one form may be undercounted. Counts include registered marks only, by registration year. Full methodology · Request a correction or removal